Comments on: Rhythm analysis, part 1 http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/index.php/2016/09/01/rhythm-analysis-part-1/ Exploring radically new modes of musical interaction in live performance Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:34:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.10 By: Seminar 21. October – Cross adaptive processing as musical intervention http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/index.php/2016/09/01/rhythm-analysis-part-1/#comment-136 Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:06:37 +0000 http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/?p=351#comment-136 […] a triplet pattern and 3:1 for a dotted 8th plus 16th pattern, re the jazz swing 8ths. See also this earlier post for more details if needed.  As an extreme example, think of a whole note at a slow tempo (1:1) […]

]]>
By: Brief system overview and evaluation – Cross adaptive processing as musical intervention http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/index.php/2016/09/01/rhythm-analysis-part-1/#comment-117 Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:29:46 +0000 http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/?p=351#comment-117 […] rhythmic consonance (rhythm_cons) and rhythmic irregularity (rhythm_irreg): described here […]

]]>
By: Rhythm analysis, part 2 – Cross adaptive processing as musical intervention http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/index.php/2016/09/01/rhythm-analysis-part-1/#comment-114 Fri, 07 Oct 2016 03:54:25 +0000 http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/?p=351#comment-114 […] mentioned in the rhythm analysis part 1, one of our goals at this point has been to try to find methods of rhythmical analysis that work […]

]]>
By: Documentation as debugging – Cross adaptive processing as musical intervention http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/index.php/2016/09/01/rhythm-analysis-part-1/#comment-92 Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:04:43 +0000 http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no/?p=351#comment-92 […] to some readers, but I thought it appropriate to note anyway. During the blog writing about the rhythmic analysis – part 1, I noticed I would tighten up the definition of terms, and also the actual implementation of the […]

]]>